The Notion Of "Spreading Democracy" Examined

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .

---

Whether it is by military intervention (coercion) through an endless series of aggressive incursions (with or without any clear and imminent danger to the security of the United States - think about Iraq) or by paying out vast sums of money (buying influence, or by a thinly-veiled attempt at bribery) from its own hyper leveraged coffers, the recent US administrations, both democratic and republican, seem determined to "spread democracy" throughout the world.

I am not speaking of politics at all. I am speaking of ulterior motives, hidden agendas, and a gross bipartisan policy failure -- at least according to its stated objectives.

Several questions come to mind:

1) Just how successful is the current US brand of democratic government?

2) What is the US administrative agenda in its military and fiscal forays throughout the world? Some speculate that the US is either trying to install its own "puppet leaders" into vulnerable/ unstable regimes, or to 'buy' international allies.

The article excerpt which follows just came from the New York Times. After you have quickly reviewed it, please come back to this page and we can discuss several theories as to why this is occurring and what it will bring.

U.S. Prepares Economic Aid to Bolster Democracy in Egypt

By STEVEN LEE MYERS

The Obama administration's efforts, delayed by turmoil in Egypt and wariness in Washington, includes $1 billion in debt relief.

Here's another beauty to keep you awake at night...

Afghanistan admits hundreds of soldiers poorly vetted, tied to insurgents
The Washington Post (9/5) 

Why do we expend endless resources and the lives of young men and women in a program that is clearly failing at its stated objective? I do not know th3e answer, but I will tell you this much [reference The Taking Command Blog]: 

Thought: Perhaps the agenda is not really to "spread democracy" at all. I'd be very curious to know what the agenda (or agendas) actually is/ are, and who are the puppeteers behind that agenda who stand to gain the most. Wouldn't you? 

Douglas E. Castle for The Internationalist Page Blog, The Global Futurist Blog and The Daily Burst Of Brilliance Blog 

p.s. Please Retweet us, and share us with your social networks. Thank you!

---

Related articles

• The demise of democracy: Part 4 (Middle East) (paullau.wordpress.com)
• US Nears Deal for $1 Billion in Egypt Debt Relief (voanews.com)
• Arab Spring: Hopes for democracy spring eternal (upi.com)
• U.S. Prepares Economic Aid to Bolster Democracy in Egypt (nytimes.com)
• The Democracy Delusion and Obama's Failed Mideast Policy (frontpagemag.com)
• The Agenda: World: For the United States, Arab Spring Raises Question of Values Versus Interests (thelede.blogs.nytimes.com)
• In Mongolia, Clinton argues for free markets with democracy in Asia, challenging Chinese model (foxnews.com)
• US, China Discuss South China Sea Dispute; Chinese Newspaper Slams Clinton For Implicit Remarks Against Beijing (ibtimes.com)
• Now On Line: 'China and Democracy' Debate With Minxin Pei and Eric Li (theatlantic.com)

Citizen Ambassadors, Citizen Activists And True Democracy

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .

---

The following article extract comes to us courtesy of Truthout.org, an organization labeled by many as being "Progressive" (now a pejorative term when spoken by conservatives and Republicans) news source. And yes, I read The Liberty Digest, too (they tend to be called "right-wing" or "ultra-conservative" by many of those folks whom others are calling Progressives and Liberals. I read as much as I can, and I make my own decisions after gleaning insights from the full spectrum of politicized and cause-based media.

I am what some people would call an "Independent Thinker." It even gets lonely. By our nature, we really can't have a club, except to beat each other with. And for goodness' sake, stop calling Independent Thinkers, Non-Joiners, Sideliners And Revolutionaries "Anarchists" -- we are anything but Anarchists.

Please read the article excerpt which follows, then hit the "BACK" button on your browser, and come back. We aren't finished with this discussion. It concerns all of Human Civilization internationally.

Sunday 1 January 2012

Populism Isn't Dead, It's Marching: What 19th Century Farmers Can Teach Occupiers About How to Keep Going

Ashley Sanders, War Is A Crime.org: "Not so long ago, Americans witnessed the beginning of a mass democratic uprising.... They did it to reject debt. They did it to fight foreclosures. They did it to topple a world where the 1 percent determined life for the other 99. And they did all of it against incredible odds, with a self-respect that stymied critics. The year? 1877. The people? Dirt-poor farmers who would come to be known as Populists."
Read the Article

--------------

THE INTERNATIONALIST PAGE COMMENTARY:

To have any type of democracy flourish, certain preconditions should exist, and should be sustained and vigorously defended. Any tear in the fabric of democratic principles invites unconscionable abuses and contortions of the very concept of "people working, through informed argument, compelling conversation and majority agreement, with tolerance and provision for those who may disagree, to operate in a synergistic manner which benefits as great a percentage of the participants as possible without any unnecessary restriction of essential freedoms." This is my ideal for a functioning democracy.

1) Free exchange of information, news and ideas through unrestricted communication across all demographic and geographical borders;

2) A reasonable standard of education for all. Education is crucial, and is too often neglected around budget season. Simply put, NO EDUCATION = NO DEMOCRACY;

3) A safe, accessible forum for direct voting on all issues of concern for all participants, and a vigorous turnout for these votes. No gerrymandering, electoral colleges, no delegation to 'greater minds' -- simply a direct, uncontrived vote, with an honest, audited, public count;

4) Limited laws, made by vote, which are based on the need for cooperative effort, or to prevent significant physical dangers to the entire population -- not laws for the purpose of creating jobs, granting privileges, regulating morality, and to keep politicians and other potentially parasitic intermediaries busy;

5) Equal treatment under those limited laws -- it would certainly help if each voting participant imagined himself or herself being prosecuted or persecuted as a lawbreaker, as opposed to the notion of controlling the behavior, beliefs and practices of others to conform to their own beliefs...laws should be made to protect and not to restrict or constrain;

And last, every world citizen should have the right to question authority, orders, demands, perceived abuses, pirating of democracy, and other potential cracks in the foundation of true democracy. Democracy cannot be be forced upon people. Democracy cannot be bought. Democracy does not equate to somnambulistic conformity.

Every citizen must be an activist, and an informed participant to deserve and to create a democracy. Democracy is a difficult form of civilization -- it requires relentless work, transparency and a great deal of open communication.

How many true democracies do you think that we have in our world today? Hmmm....I wonder.

Remember this, too. Democracy disintegrates if it is neglected. It requires vigilance; but I believe the benefits are truly worth the effort.

Douglas E Castle for THE INTERNATIONALIST PAGE

---

Related articles

• A Panicked and Desperate ALEC Admits that They Are Being Defeated (aboriginalpress.wordpress.com)
• Liberal Congressmen and Senators Make Case For Overturning Citizens United (alternet.org)
• Democracy Brings Poverty and Tyranny (lewrockwell.com)
• 'Nine Dollar Gas' Tops Political-Ad Charts (blogs.wsj.com)
• Why the Medicare Forecasts Are Particularly Cloudy (blogs.wsj.com)
• Cruel To Be Kind - Nick Lowe (radiodazz.blogspot.com)
• Liberal Groups Plan to Protest at Shareholder Meetings (blogs.wsj.com)
• The Need to Take Part (parishgov.wordpress.com)
• China Experiments: From Local Innovations to National Reform (foreignaffairs.com)
• The problem of expertise in a liberal democracy (inpropriapersona.com)
• Tocqueville's Democratic Despotism (publicreason2012.wordpress.com)