Showing posts with label international politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label international politics. Show all posts

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Negotiations Versus Noise And Childishness: The U.S. And Ecuador

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .







With all of the hooey being flung about in places from tornado-struck trailer parks to Washington DC’s buttoned-down Political Action Committees and caucuses (actually a very funny term in this particular context) regarding TV’s Pork Princess Paula Deen’s using the “n-word,” which, ironically can only be used by those whom it rudely deprecates, and then trying to explain and apologize (which was the political and negotiating equivalent of stating a guilty plea followed by a show-biz finale of slowly screwing down deeper and deeper into a bed of quicksand in a sloppy suicide attempt) for her faux pas [that’s French!], alongside the somewhat more significant melodramatic war of words between U.S. Legislators and Ecuador (with Russia rooting and saber-rattling for Ecuador), I was faced with a dilemma.



At the core of the the comedy is a  Mr. Snowden, some “leaker” who divulged some serious secret U.S. information to a world of unauthorized parties [without Top Secret clearance!], is living the Tom Hanks part in the movie “Terminal,” at the present time -- but in a Russian airport, waiting for clearance from Russia and Ecuador that he can have asylum in Ecuador, from which place he won’t be extradited to the U.S. where he would face some very serious charges and a very likely draconian sentence (the U.S. is nothing but serious nowadays, and it enjoys prosecution, incarceration and cheap prison labor -- it’s supposed to be good for the U.S. economy -- and directly, through the Bureau Of Prisons’ Unicor program, has inmates at far less than the Minimum Wage involved in building cables and other non-combustible or explosive stuff to help perpetuate the war effort at various places in the world).


Several things are certain:


1) You cannot negotiate effectively if you are an obvious hypocrite;


2) You cannot negotiate unofficially, through the noisy innuendo-laced or threat-laden comments by grandstanding legislators who have no authority or directive;


3) Before you criticize, take a good, hard look at who you are and what you’ve done, lest you be made a fool of...


A drowning man should not be negotiating too harshly (if at all) with the people who have a life preserver or a rope to throw him.


I didn’t know whether to call this article (which I was busily trying to find a suitable angle for) to be published in The Internationalist Page Blog “The Mouse That Roared” or “When Is It Politically Correct To Call A ‘Spade’ A ‘Spade’?”  I was torn between two temptations. So I opted for a totally different title which, I knew would in retrospect, look more sophisticated.


The moral of the story is to be careful what you say, how you say it and to whom you say it.
It’s simple. but the U.S. has forgotten that lesson (just as it would seem that it has forgotten about the Constitution), and is getting no end of trouble in the International Community because of it. Yet the principle is so simple that even a dim-witted child (I know this from personal experience -- as any of Douglas E. Castle’s elementary school teachers about it) could understand it. Oh well.


An article which appeared in The Associated Press (AP) gave a wonderfully fact-filled tennis match-like report of the heated dialogue between Ecuador (the “Brave Little Mouse”) and the United States (the “Naked Emperor,” or the “Paper-Printing Tiger,” [sorry Mr. Bernanke, but someone had to say it] or the “World’s Policeman-Turned Bully”). This passion play artfully sets forth two noble truths: 1) never make an idle threat or empty threat, as it can be turned around and made to bit you on the rump of your ‘royalty’, and 2) you’d better have your own hands clean (the U.S. didn’t because of all of the revelations circulating about The Internationalist Community regarding the NSA’s unchecked, continued and increasing ‘excursions’ around the letter and spirit of the U.S. Constitution as well as it’s flagrant violations of certain fundamental Human rights.


Jun 27, 9:18 PM EDT


Ecuador heats rhetoric as Obama downplays Snowden


By MICHAEL WEISSENSTEIN and JULIE PACE


QUITO, Ecuador (AP) -- President Barack Obama tried to cool the international frenzy over Edward Snowden on Thursday as Ecuador stepped up its defiance and said it was preemptively rejecting millions in trade benefits that it could lose by taking in the fugitive from his limbo in a Moscow airport.


The country seen as likeliest to shelter the National Security Agency leaker seemed determined to prove it could handle any repercussions, with three of its highest officials calling an early-morning news conference to "unilaterally and irrevocably renounce" $23 million a year in lowered tariffs on products such as shrimp and frozen vegetables.


Fernando Alvarado, the secretary of communications for leftist President Rafael Correa, sarcastically suggested the U.S. use the money to train government employees to respect human rights.


Obama, meanwhile, sought to downplay the international chase for the man he called "a 29-year-old hacker" and lower the temperature of an issue that has raised tensions between the U.S. and uneasy partners Russia and China. Obama said in Senegal that the damage to U.S. national security has already been done and his top focus now is making sure it can't happen again.


"I'm not going to have one case with a suspect who we're trying to extradite suddenly be elevated to the point where I've got to start doing wheeling and dealing and trading on a whole host of other issues, simply to get a guy extradited so he can face the justice system," Obama said at a joint news conference with Senegal's President Macky Sall.


While the Ecuadorean government appeared angry over U.S. threats of punishment if it accepts Snowden, there were also mixed signals about how eager it was to grant asylum. For days, officials here have been blasting the U.S. and praising Snowden's leaks of NSA eavesdropping secrets as a blow for global human rights.


But they also have repeatedly insisted that they are nowhere close to making a decision on whether Snowden can leave Moscow, where he is believed to be holed up in an airport transit zone, for refuge in this oil-rich South American nation.


"It's a complex situation, we don't know how it'll be resolved," Correa told a news conference Thursday in his first public comments on the case aside from a handful of postings on Twitter.


The Ecuadorean leader said that in order for Snowden's asylum application to be processed, he would have to be in Ecuador or inside an Ecuadorean Embassy, "and he isn't." Another country would have to permit Snowden to transit its territory for that requirement to be met, Correa said.


WikiLeaks, which has been aiding Snowden, announced earlier he was en route to Ecuador and had received a travel document. On Wednesday, the Univision television network displayed an unsigned letter of safe passage for him.


Officials on Thursday acknowledged that the Ecuadorean Embassy in London had issued a June 22 letter of safe passage for Snowden that calls on other countries to allow him to travel to asylum in Ecuador. But Ecuador's secretary of political management, Betty Tola, said the letter was invalid because it was issued without the approval of the government in the capital, Quito.


She also threatened legal action against whoever leaked the document, which she said "has no validity and is the exclusive responsibility of the person who issued it."


"This demonstrates a total lack of coordination in the department of foreign affairs," said Santiago Basabe, a professor of political science at the Latin American School of Social Sciences in Quito. "It's no small question to issue a document of safe passage or a diplomatic document for someone like Snowden without this decision being taken directly by the foreign minister or president."


The renunciation of trade benefits was a dramatic but mostly symbolic threat. The U.S Congress was widely expected to let the benefits lapse in coming weeks, for reasons unrelated to the Snowden case. And if they continued, it appeared highly unlikely that the Ecuadorean government would be able to unilaterally cancel tariff benefits that went directly to their country's exporters.


Behind Ecuador's mixed messages, some analysts saw not confusion but internal divisions in the Ecuadorean government.


Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue, a think tank focused on Latin America, said many in Washington believed that Correa, a leftist elected to a third term in February, had been telegraphing a desire to moderate and take a softer tack toward the United States and private business.


Harder-core leftists led by Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino may be seeking to maintain a tough line, he said, a division expressing itself in confusing messages.


"I think there really are different factions within the government on this," Shifter said. "Correa wants to become more moderate. That has been the signal that has been communicated in Washington."


Embarrassment for the Obama administration over the surveillance revelations continued as documents disclosed Thursday showed the Obama administration gathered U.S. citizens' Internet data until 2011, continuing a spying program started under President George W. Bush that revealed whom Americans exchanged emails with and the Internet Protocol address of their computer.


The National Security Agency ended the program that collected email logs and timing, but not content, in 2011 because it decided it didn't effectively stop terrorist plots, according to the NSA's director, Gen. Keith Alexander, who also heads the U.S. Cyber Command. He said all data was purged in 2011.


Britain's Guardian newspaper on Thursday released documents detailing the collection, though the program was also described earlier this month by The Washington Post.


The U.S. administration was expected to decide by Monday what export privileges to grant Ecuador under the Generalized System of Preferences, a program meant to spur development and growth in poorer countries.


Although the deadline was set long before the Snowden affair, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said Thursday that Ecuador's application to add a handful of products such as artichokes and cut flowers - the latter a major industry here - would not be decided immediately but would remain pending. That gives the U.S. additional leverage over Ecuador while Snowden's fate remains uncertain.


More broadly, a larger trade pact allowing reduced tariffs on more than $5 billion in annual exports to the U.S. is up for congressional renewal before July 21. While approval of the Andean Trade Preference Act has long been seen as doubtful in Washington, Ecuador has been lobbying strongly for its renewal.


On Wednesday, Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, pledged to lead an effort to block extension of U.S. tariff benefits if Ecuador grants asylum to Snowden, who turned 30 last week. Nearly half of Ecuador's billions a year in foreign trade depends on the United States.


The Obama administration said Thursday that accepting Snowden would damage the overall relationship between the two countries and analysts said it was almost certain that granting the leaker asylum would lead the U.S. to cut roughly $30 million a year in military and law enforcement assistance.


Granting asylum to Snowden would cause "great difficulties in our bilateral relationship," State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell said. "If they take that step, that would have very negative repercussions."


Alvarado, the communications minister, said his country rejects economic "blackmail" in the form of threats against the trade measures.


"The preferences were authorized for Andean countries as compensation for the fight against drugs, but soon became a new instrument of pressure," he said. "As a result, Ecuador unilaterally and irrevocably renounces these preferences."


Alvarado did not explicitly mention the separate effort to win trade benefits under the presidential order.


He did suggest, however, how the U.S. could use the money saved from Ecuadorean tariffs to train government employees to respect citizens' rights.


"Ecuador offers the United States $23 million a year in economic aid, an amount similar to what we were receiving under the tariff benefits, with the purpose of providing human rights training that will contribute to avoid violations of people's privacy, that degrade humanity," he said.
---
Pace reported from Dakar, Senegal. Gonzalo Solano in Quito, Peter Orsi in Caracas, Venezuela, and Ken Thomas in Washington contributed to this report.
---
Follow Michael Weissenstein on Twitter at http://twitter.com/mweissenstein


###

Subsequently, while US President Obama was trying to play down the whole incident and get on to other matters of State, Vice President Joe Biden was trying to do some political worldview damage control by more politely (without idle threats and unkindness) engaging in somewhat conciliatory talks with Quito and still gently insisting that they should not give Mr. Snowden, the man without a country, asylum and allow him to escape “justice” at the hands of the U.S. But since the revelations about Guantanamo, most of the Internationalist Community believes that U.S. “justice” is merely a euphemism for punishment.


Thank you for reading me, and for sharing my articles with your connections and colleagues across the various social networks through your increasing stockpile of media sharing tools, both computer and mobile!




Please feel free to join me on Linked In.









View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn

Douglas E Castle
All Blogs & RSS Feeds

Share this page
Contact Douglas Castle
Follow Me on Pinterest



Financing



CFI, C.F.I., CrowdFunding Incubator,  crowdfunding, crowd funding, incubators, accelerators, finance projects, listing services, start up, small business, SME, funding, capitalization, financing, leverage, company services, management, marketing, fundraising, technology, mentoring, advice, media, branding, memes, business tips tricks tools and resources, entrepreneur, forum, discussion, applications, technologies, risk assessment, business model, strategic planning, organizational development, connections, networking, early-stage, first-round, angel  funding, venture capital, credit lines, assistance, business growth, biz builders, social media power, delegation, automation, monitoring, metrics, brainstorming, meetups, joint ventures, partnerships - http://CFICrowdFundingIncubator.blogspot.com, http://www.CrowdFundingIncubator.com, marketing, messaging, news releases, free, gain market share, increase backlinks, SEO, influence, disruption theory, directory, RSS feeds, Douglas E. Castle, blogroll, blogs, crowdfunding blogs...


***
View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn

Douglas E. Castle - Blogger Profile
CFI - Notes From The CEO
Instant Musical Counterpoint - Relax!



 













Saturday, December 01, 2012

Who Gets The Lion's Share Of UN Funds?

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .







Just as a matter of making publicly-available (but not always highly publicized) information on the operations of the United Nations accessible to all of my colleagues, readers, followers and the occasional accidental tourist to The Internationalist Page Blog site, I thought it would be of benefit to take a good look at where the UN's money is invested. This information sometimes provides very, very valuable clues into which countries and causes carry the most clout with this august body of brilliance [I tend to be sarcastic, but I am making a conscious effort to cut back a bit], and which parties have the best lobbying access to its international purse strings.

Please be fully at liberty to draw whatever conclusions you wish from the data set forth in the table embedded in the article below, which appears courtesy of the U.K. Guardian, a superb publication upon which many Internationalists and Global Futurists as well as business leaders have come to rely:

-----------------------------------------------

Guardian Global Development 

Who's doing business with the UN? – get the data

Developing and emerging economies, led by India and Russia, are winning a growing share of UN business but American companies still dominate.
united nations soldiers
UN peacekeeping forces in Ivory Coast. Which countries are doing the most business with the UN? Photograph: Rebecca Blackwell/AP

The UN spends billions of dollars each year buying goods and services for peacekeeping, humanitarian and development projects around the world. In the UK, this has made the global body a key target for the government's aid-funded business service, which seeks to connect British companies with the lucrative business opportunities offered by development finance.

The share of UN business going to rich countries has long been a source of contention for developing countries. Two general assembly resolutions, in 2005 and 2007, pushed the UN to increase opportunities for firms from developing and transition economies to win its contracts.

In 2006, China and the G77 group of developing countries "noted with dismay" the small share of UN business going to the majority of member states.

So who's doing business with the UN? And how have things changed over time? Last week the largely low-profile UN office for project services (Unops) uploaded five years and $56bn worth of UN procurement data, making it possible – for the first time – to closely examine and monitor how the UN system spends its money.

Highlights from the data:
• In 2011 UN organisations spent $14.3bn buying everything from food and medicines to transport and construction services – down from $14.5bn in 2010 but still significantly higher than the $10.1bn spent in 2007.
• Developing and emerging economies, led by India (5.1%) and Russia (4.2%), are gaining a growing share of this business. Indian firms sell goods to UN agencies, notably vaccines, pharmaceuticals and medical equipment. Russian companies primarily sell air transport services and food supplies.

• In 2011, procurement from developing and emerging countries increased by $126m, bringing their share of UN business to 58.7%.

• The US is still the top supplier of goods and services to the sprawling UN system, providing 10% of the total last year.
• Some UN agencies buy more from developing countries than others. The UN development programme (UNDP), for example, buys 79% of its goods and services from developing and emerging economies, while the UN children's fund (Unicef) buys less than 40% from them.
• The UK sold £417m in goods and services to the UN last year, down from £490m in 2010 but up by 40% from $295m in 2007.
Unops says it is "committed to ensuring fair and equitable access to the UN market" and has tried to support developing country firms through outreach and capacity-building programmes, simplifying its vendor registration procedures, improving access to tender opportunities through an online portal, and restructuring bidding to make it easier for small and medium-sized enterprises to participate.

In addition, it says, the industrial sectors of many developing and emerging economies have become more competitive since 2005, which can help explain their growth in the UN market.
The UN has been tainted by high-profile procurement controversies in the past – from the Oil-for-food scandal to suspicions of collusion and price inflation in procurement for peacekeeping operations.

Previously, data on UN procurement was included in annual reports, published as pdfs, making it difficult to extract, explore and analyse.
Vitaly Vanshelboim, Unops deputy executive director, said the data release was part of the organisation's broader commitment to transparency. "The more all stakeholders can see and understand how development funds are used, the greater the chance is that these limited resources will be used effectively," he said.

Unops has published further details of its own contracts – including supplier names and the purpose of awarded contracts – on a dynamic feed updated every 24 hours, and geo-coded information on the over 1,000 projects it supports around the world.
The full data is below. What can you do with it?

Data summary

Who's doing business with the UN? - the top 20

Click heading to sort table. Download this data
Vendor country
2011
2010
2009
Share of total (in 2011)
United States of America $1,534,803,021.91 1519019984.16 1733956044.89 10.81%
Switzerland $735,893,330.09 841354062.71 843782922.74 5.18%
India $724,630,023.31 567608257.95 676702318.76 5.11%
Russian Federation $597,174,111.05 552084421.24 463186905.13 4.21%
Afghanistan $537,300,509.68 669208062.03 435966915.7 3.79%
Belgium $455,300,042.12 324861633.06 388138297.68 3.21%
France $436,711,828.77 443770765.51 408082048.37 3.08%
Italy $423,258,480.89 376898865.62 392228784.23 2.98%
Denmark $422,400,542.75 469895788.21 346782365.75 2.98%
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland $417,037,808.38 489993859.05 411303921.8 2.94%
Sudan $404,841,260.87 601708018.51 641655138.39 2.85%
Kenya $398,823,598.27 298902180.87 299968801.78 2.81%
Argentina $365,809,657.34 344488500.24 170636967.67 2.58%
United Arab Emirates $306,564,887.38 164531644.99 128089670.61 2.16%
Pakistan $267,653,789.00 468497687.89 185142235.45 1.89%
Panama $196,244,948.46 140569667.01 179050150.82 1.38%
Germany $195,355,715.78 202244051.58 181167991.1 1.38%
Brazil $188,901,055.10 227243349.22 125087499.52 1.33%
South Africa $188,205,761.95 210129624.68 257946449.73 1.33%

Well, colleagues, readers, followers and all others who have stopped by, please don't ever stop thinking that the UN is, as are all government and intergovernmental bodies, a political animal which gives its fiscal love to the highest bidder, the squeaky wheel or the most attractive (and "politically correct") guest at the latest fund-raiser.

This does not offset the good that the UN does in terms of humanitarianism, it just shows that there are other aspects to UN that warrant some scrutiny and open analysis.

As always, thank you for reading me, and for retweeting me.

Douglas E. Castle




View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn

Douglas E Castle
All Blogs & RSS Feeds

Share this page
Contact Douglas Castle
Follow Me on Pinterest



Financing




Blog Archive

Bookmark and Share