Showing posts with label slavery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label slavery. Show all posts

Sunday, August 05, 2012

Middle Managers Being Automated Out Of Employment? An End To The Middle-Class?

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .






The middle class of most of the industrialized nations is being displaced radically. It started with outsourcing in general, and has now graduated to automation of tasks and entire jobs which used to be the domain of middle management, to IT functions. From a demographic perspective, as middle management disappears, several things occur:

1) The social middle class begins to disappear;

2) unemployment overall begins to rise;

3) crime begins to rise;

4) former middle class families join the ranks of the working poor;

5) consumerism in these nations suffers;

6) project managers, program managers and IT consultants become increasingly in demand, but are usually hired on a contractual or non-permanent basis;

7) the pool of talent for senior-level management and leadership begins to evaporate -- remember the "Brain Drain Effect"?;

8) The wealthiest members of each country's populace become wealthier while the ranks of the poor increase -- the disparity between the free and the economically enslaved increases;

9) Thinking as a follower of The Global Futurist Blog might, the de-humanization of the workplace and the dangerous dependency on automated processes and limited artificial intelligence opens up a Pandora's Box of nightmare scenarios, including some that may bring to mind Arthur C. Clarke's "2001", The Forbin Project, The Matrix, War Games, The Terminator, and [being less dramatic] the economic catastrophes caused by unregulated, uncontrolled program trading.

Sadly, if businesses are only thinking about maximizing short-term profits and the elimination of overpriced middle management workers, they will ultimately, in the longer-term, be hit with the costs associated with the unemployment that they create (loss of domestic and international consumerism due to decreased disposable income); the costs of unforeseen programming errors and a lack of genuine human oversight; a growing resentment amongst their employees and the general public against the technology which have displaced and harmed so many...picture a scenario involving some combination of the resurgence of the Luddites, the rise of the technophobes and the war against the machines.

During a period of increasing IT utilization and automation, there will invariably be a loss in terms of properly trained and broadly experienced employees in many areas. Problem solving abilities in our species could well decline -- a lack of braintenance leads to atrophy and inertia of many of the crucial entrepreneurial and decision making skills required in order to conduct business.

An interesting article from BigThink Ideafeed follows for your viewing. When you have finished scanning the article, please come back to this site so that we may come to some conclusions, and pass out a bit of food for thought.

RETHINKING THE WORKPLACE [An article excerpt from BigThink Ideafeed]
How Far Will Businesses Go to Automate the Middle Class into Unemployment?
Competition is driving companies to automate more and more middle-class jobs. Sectors of the economy like legal research and nursing are being "hallowed out" says an MIT economist.

While there are certain cases where a machine (or IT, or an application) can certainly replace a human being, my fear, and the fear which I anticipate in many reactive individuals, is that a simple efficiency- and cost-saving strategy may just go too far.

The other tremendous disadvantage associated with technological dependence in general, and the increasing scope of the virtual workplace in particular is that interpersonal and communications skills are sharply declining amongst the Millenials and even persons in more advanced age brackets. This is highly damaging to any global economic recovery as well as to the future of our Internationalist civilization as a species.

The questions which we must all ask ourselves are these:

1) What is the optimal blend of Human and machine?

2) What will the future of original thought, innovation, employment, consumerism and other important economic and sociological variables be if the current trends continue?

3) Who is serving whom? Will Humankind ultimately surrender its freedoms of dissent, expression, creativity, disruption and those other special gifts which we too often take for granted, to thinking machines?

I would like for every scientist, economist, engineer, sociologist, psychologist, trend-spotter and every domestic and international policymaker to consider these issues.

Douglas E. Castle for The Internationalist Page Blog




View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn


Douglas E Castle
All Blogs & RSS Feeds

Share this page
Contact Douglas Castle
Follow Me on Pinterest

Monday, March 29, 2010

Everybody Wants To Be Free, Or So It Would Seem...

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Everybody Wants To Be Free, Or So It Would Seem…

Note: This article was written and is copyright © 2010 by Douglas Castle, with all rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced or transmitted by any means whatsoever without the author’s prior written consent unless the article is reproduced in its entirety, unedited, with all hyperlinks fully intact and operational. The article was simultaneously published in the following media: The Internationalist Page, the Global Interworked Cooperative Business Community (GICBC) blog, and in the author’s own blog. The author is a featured columnist in The National Networker Newsletter- You may join The National Networker Companies (a GICBC) and receive the Weekly Newsletter™, The Blue Tuesday Report™ and other publications of interest to entrepreneurs and emerging enterprises by clicking on http://bit.ly/JoinTNNW.


Everybody claims to want to be free. In some cases, this notion of freedom means the power to take the reins of responsibility and accept the consequences. In the other cases, this notion actually entails the elimination of the burden of responsibility – this latter type of “freedom” sounds shockingly similar to a plea for enslavement. It is not freedom – it is purely an idyllic and ephemeral sense of security, at very most. It is a lazy daydream.

What does the notion of “freedom” mean to you? It’s a difficult question. It requires that you confront yourself with the pointed query, “do I truly want to be a master, or am I merely fit to be a slave who desires to be treated reasonably well?”

When you have answered this question posed to yourself, you will find, sadly, that there is no “middle ground.” You are either a slave or a master. And the choice is yours alone.  

Freedom invariably comes at a cost and at great risk if it is truly freedom – the definition of freedom that involves self-determination. Freedom offers no guarantees, and it is never fully safe. It is subject to constant challenge, both within us, and due to forces in the world outside of us.

Those few persons in positions of control (geographically, politically, ethnically, racially, financially, militarily, ideologically…) do not give up their slaves and subjects easily. They enjoy the power of domination, of mastery over themselves and over others. Yet, most of these masters (whether bullies, petty despots, tyrants or spoiled beneficiaries) are quite dependent upon their slaves, and upon the thrall that holds them. For without their slaves, they could no longer see themselves as masters. Masters sometimes get complacent and lazy. Slaves sometimes get lean and mean.

Sometimes the slaves unite, bonded in misery and despair, and begin to plan revolutions and escapes. That is one of the greatest threats to any self-proclaimed “master” – slaves communicating with one another, exchanging information, and getting organized.

Suppressed rage and bottled up fury can be powerful propellants. Organization is a means of focusing energy.  The internet and increasingly portable and far-reaching communications technology provide a means for slaves to collaborate in synergy. Rage, organization and technology, combined together, portend an upheaval in the status quo.

Governments, in theory, are either: 1) constructs of their collective constituents (i.e., the people who elect, empower and entrust them), whom they serve, or they are 2) self-centered powers purely unto themselves, imposing their will upon the people whom they have enslaved, and upon whom they feed, like parasites eating away at a host.

Both types of government, elected or imposed, tend to represent to their citizens or subjects that they “exist to serve and protect them,” either from themselves (taking dangerous medications, driving unsafely, et cetera), from each other (domestic crime and civil war), or from outside attackers (i.e., other sovereign powers, aliens from outer space, or terrorists).

From an historical perspective, every government seizes additional power and reduces individual liberties when a threat to “the public welfare” or to “the national security” is perceived. Posed with this type of a threat, citizens and subjects are invariably willing to compromise their freedoms in the interest of additional security, whether this security is real or imagined.

The escalation in the global War on Terror will be a great determinant of the future of the Human species. What will be fascinating to observe will be the turning point – the Turning Point is that moment at which the majority of the people perceive their government as being as oppressive as the terrorists from whom they are supposedly being protected.

By my simplistic definition, a terrorist is any individual who is determined to deprive another person (a non-combatant) of his or her property, freedom or life. And I’ll admit that my simple definition could be applied to persons who would not ordinarily be labeled as “terrorists.”

Some of them don’t wield guns. Some of them wield propaganda. Some of them storm a target by force, or strap bombs to their bodies and willingly sacrifice their own lives while taking a number of innocent lives as well. Some of them gradually subvert the will of a people until the people are virtually hypnotized into building their own cages and coffins. Some might view this as “jobs creation.”

American statesman Benjamin Franklin said it eloquently some time ago:

Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”

If you truly believe in freedom, you’ll know that it cannot be delegated, assigned or entrusted to any government, agency or organization.

Freedom is ultimately an individual choice and an individual responsibility, lest our protectors become our captors and masters, and we all become slaves.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle
03.29.2010.

Braintenance - Stay razor sharp.
The Internationalist Page - A world without barriers.
The Global Futurist - Revealing trends.
Taking Command! - Mastering your fate.



This article was published in the GICBC ("Global Interworked Cooperative Business Community") Blog, which is located at GICBC.
Follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/gicbc
Douglas Castle, Organizational Facilitator

Blog Archive

Bookmark and Share