Showing posts with label xenophobia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label xenophobia. Show all posts

Friday, November 20, 2009

The Gravity and Magnetism of INTERNATIONALISM

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



The Gravity and Magnetism of INTERNATIONALISM
Note: This article was written by Douglas Castle for THE INTERNATIONALIST PAGE (http://TheInternationalistPage.blogspot.com), where it was first published. This article may not be reproduced or re-published except in its entirety, with full attribution and all hyperlinks left intact and alive. The author is a Featured Columnist for THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. Please join the TNNWC Community (free) by going to http://twitlik.com/IN

 Dear Friends:

Internationalism is an idea which clashes with the encultured status and belief systems deeply ingrained in much of the World's leadership. Any change is frightening to the Human psyche, and the acceptance of the idea of "A World Without Walls," while poetically appealing, meets the natural resistance elements of inertia, indolence, ignorance and greed. Protectionism and xenophobia certainly play their own special roles.

It is difficult to go from a lifetime of perceiving others as enemies to recognizing them as prospective allies. A quantum change in broad perception takes time. Internationalism moves forward in small steps, despite major advances in information and communications technology, which are pushing Internationalism forward. Sadly, too many persons, industries and organizations have become invested in building fortresses instead of bridges.

Even in the European Union, there is an awkwardness and a wariness about their tenuously-bound microcosm of Internationalism. But it represents an honest, albeit cautious start.

The following article was excerpted from THE NEW YORK TIMES:

November 20, 2009

Low Profile Leaders Chosen for Top European Posts

BRUSSELS — Leaders of the 27 countries of the European Union on Thursday night chose Herman Van Rompuy, the Belgian prime minister, as the European Union’s first president, and Catherine Ashton of Britain, currently the bloc’s trade commissioner, as its high representative for foreign policy. The vote was unanimous.

Both officials are highly respected but little known outside their own countries. After the European Union’s eight-year battle to rewrite its internal rules and to pass the Lisbon Treaty that created these two new jobs, the selection of such low-profile figures seemed to highlight Europe’s problems instead of its readiness to take a more united and forceful place in world affairs.

In a sense, Europe seemed to be living down to expectations. Earlier, the foreign minister of Sweden, Carl Bildt, warned against a “minimalist solution” that would reduce the union’s “opportunity to have a clear voice in the world.”

“It is quite astounding,” said Olivier Ferrand, president of Terra Nova, a center-left research institute in France. “It is jaw-dropping. It is the end of ambition for the E.U. — really disappointing.”

The deal that produced the two choices emerged as a result of backroom negotiations among leaders jockeying for future and more important economic portfolios that could be more powerful in the enlarged European Union, which is still more of an economic union than a political one and looks to remain so.

Mr. Van Rompuy (pronounced ROM-pow), 62, an economist, has been Belgium’s prime minister for less than a year. Ms. Ashton, 53, has next to no foreign policy experience and has never been elected to anything.

They are expected to take up their jobs on Jan. 1. Ms. Ashton still needs the endorsement of the European Parliament.

Both emerged when Britain’s choice for president, Tony Blair, met with overwhelming opposition, stemming from his past pro-American policies, support for the Iraq war and star qualities.

The British prime minister, Gordon Brown, finally bowed to the inevitable late Thursday afternoon and dropped his backing for his predecessor. By supporting Mr. Van Rompuy — a Roman Catholic and a Christian Democrat from the center-right, who supported the positioning of American nuclear weapons in Belgium — Mr. Brown opened up the foreign policy job to the center-left. With support from fellow center-left leaders, he pitched Ms. Ashton for the job.

A fresh opportunity for European leadership appeared to be the great promise of the Lisbon Treaty, which created the jobs of president and foreign policy chief and was approved earlier this month after years of political struggle. The idea had been to simplify the management of an enlarged European Union and to appoint senior European figures who could speak for the group.
But the leaders of Europe’s most powerful countries, France and Germany, did not want to be overshadowed. Nor apparently did their foreign ministers.

Thursday night, Mr. Van Rompuy told reporters, mixing English, French and Dutch, that “I did not seek this job.”

“But from tonight,” he added, “I will do it with conviction and enthusiasm.”

He said that he was reluctant to abandon the stewardship of Belgium, but that “Europe is a union of values and has the responsibility of playing an important role in the world.”

The selection of Ms. Ashton — formally Baroness Ashton of Upholland — was particularly striking given the deep foreign policy experience of both officials whom she will succeed in the European Union: Javier Solana, who had been Spain’s foreign minister and then secretary general of NATO, and Benita Ferrero-Waldner, who had been Austria’s foreign minister.

By contrast, Ms. Ashton has had jobs in domestic policy and was appointed to the House of Lords in 1999. She was named leader of the House of Lords, in charge of steering government legislation through the chamber, in 2007. She was then appointed to the European Commission in October 2008. As European commissioner for trade, she has negotiated with foreigners and impressed her colleagues.

Ms. Ashton told reporters that “it is a measure of my surprise that I have not prepared a speech.” She said that she was Britain’s first female European Union commissioner and the first woman to be trade commissioner, and was proud to be the first high representative. “Am I an ego on legs? I am not,” she said. “Judge me on what I do, and I think you will be proud of me.”

If the point of the Lisbon Treaty was to create a more prominent face for Europe, the result on Thursday was the opposite. It appeared to be a political deal that would do little to reduce the power, stature and influence of big nations or their foreign ministers.

“It’s going to be difficult to explain to the public why there was so much fuss about the Lisbon Treaty if all we get is someone no one has heard of,” said one European Union official, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Mr. Van Rompuy, who likes bowling duckpins and writing haiku, has earned respect for calming ethnic tensions in Belgium in his 11 months as prime minister. Someone who met him recently described him as intelligent and humorous, but “timid.” He only reluctantly took on the job of prime minister, and did not push himself forward for this one.

One recent Van Rompuy haiku went this way: “A fly zooms, buzzes; Spins and is lost in the room; He does no one harm.”

In a sign of how little respect the foreign policy job appeared to attract, the most prominent person mentioned previously to fill it, David Miliband, the British foreign secretary, chose instead to work domestically to revive the fortunes of the Labour Party, widely expected to lose the next election to the Conservatives. His decision not to pursue a lucrative job in Brussels has only helped him in Britain.

Stephen Castle reported from Brussels, and Steven Erlanger from Paris.
####

The good news is that progress is being made. It is my hope, and the hope of many other Internationalists, that this progress picks up speed and momentum.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle
COMMENT On This Article!

Share/Save/Bookmark
Subscribe
________________________________________________________
KEYWORDS, TERMS, LABELS AND ORGANIZATIONS:


globalism, internationalism, cartels, CFR, NGO, UN, EU, WTO, IMF, central bank, outsourcing, offshoring, capital markets, import, export, international trade, strategic alliances, e-commerce, entrepreneurship, social networking, banking, finance, trade, ventures, business, securities, stock exchanges, indexes, futurism, trends, citizen ambassadorship, enterprise, capitalism, international politics, commodities, prime rate, LIBOR, foreign currencies, foreign exchange, blogs, blogging, bloggers, aol, google, yahoo, msn, AP, news, media alerts, world government, world governments, international affairs, treaties, tariffs, trade restrictions, marketing, advertising, business development, arbitrage, obtaining capital, promotion, publicity, EU, NATO, military affairs, government regulation, trade restrictions, liquidity crisis, business opportunities, web-based businesses, communication, communications, technology, intelligence, embassies, consulates, business resources, Douglas Castle,The Internationalist Page, The Global Futurist, international politics, elections, time management, cyberspace, AI, energy, industry, productivity, Mixx, Digg, Technorati, Sphere, Facebook, YouTube, MySpace, LinkedIn, advertising, economics, strategy, management, cooperation, widgets, blidgets, links, incoterms, CCH, UCC, freight forwarding, custom house brokers, diversity, employment, culture, micro-loans, technological convergence, trends, financial planning, FOREX, futures, stock index, inflation, recession, sub-contracting, Department of Commerce, the next generation, amnesty, humanitarianism, foreign aid, philanthropy, charity, cooperation, peaceful cooexistence, a world without walls, The National Networker, Artificial Intelligence, AI, symbiosis, Interworked Cooperative Business Communities, ICBC, Lingovations, commerce versus combat, trends, analysis, imagination, innovation, introspection, exponentialism and the mastermind, exponentiality, predicting the future, shaping the future, adaptation, evolution, twitter, google, social media, networking groups, tendencies, statistics, joint venturing metrics, prediction, strategic interdependence, communications technologies, skype, New World Order, The 1% Rule, Mutually Assured Destruction, imperialism, fuedalism, freedom, peace, prosperity, demography, allocation of wealth, Digg, Zimbio, TNNW BUZZWORKS, Articles by Douglas Castle, search engines, entreprenership, business tools, networking, relationships, convincing, negotiating, energy, parapsychology, systems, chaos, complexity, perspective, entropy, behavioral psychology, systems of government, sovereignty, ethics, objectivisim, subjectivism, relativism, multidimensionalism, perspective, inflation, recession, valuations, intellectual property, trust, balance of power, balance of trade, balance of trade, gross domestic foreign investment, indexing, growth industries, commodities, options, exhanges, control strategies, risk evaluation, survivalism...

Subscribe Free to THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter and the BLUE TUESDAY REPORT.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

SOVEREIGNTY, BRUTALITY and UNITY

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Dear Friends:



These past several weeks have provided all of us, as students of the Human Condition, with an amazingly rich wellspring of observations and insights into the way in which our world functions (using this latter term clinically, and neutrally). By studying current events during these several action-packed weeks, we see some fascinating Human behaviors in full bloom, and not veiled in political sublety or cooperative secrecy. Two things are actually frightening in just re-reading the previous sentence: 1) that the perpetrators of some very anti-social and anti-humanitarian activities simply do not care about the "court of world opinion," and 2) that the people in power throughout the world think that we are, all of us, either to defeated to rebel, or too stupid to even perceive any significant difference in our standard of living. The persons in power, for the most part, have come to feel safely assured of our impotence of initiative to interfere with the course that they have charted for us. We prove them right time and time again. Yet, every so often, there is a major rebellion or revolution. This is usually when living conditions have become so harsh, that people defy their own risk-averse "mere survival" mode and pose serious opposition. This happens at some special tolerance point when even "mere survival" in its lowest form is threatened.



1. Firstly, let's take a quick view at the tragedy in Myanmar (Burma) as described in a news article posted by the ASSOCIATED PRESS:

UN halts aid to Myanmar after junta seizes supplies

A U.N. official says the World Food Program is suspending cyclone aid to Myanmar because its government seized supplies flown into the country.

He says the WFP has no choice but to suspend the shipments until the matter is resolved.
WFP spokesman Paul Risley said Friday that all "the food aid and equipment that we managed to get in has been confiscated." The shipment included 38 tons of high-energy biscuits.
Risley said it is not clear why the material was seized.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below:

YANGON, Myanmar (AP) — The United Nations blasted Myanmar's military government Friday, saying its refusal to let in foreign aid workers to help victims of a devastating cyclone was "unprecedented" in the history of humanitarian work.

While the junta dithered and appeared overwhelmed by last Saturday's disaster, more than 1 million homeless people waited for food, shelter and medicine. Many crammed into Buddhist monasteries or just camped out in the open.

Entire villages were submerged in the worst-hit Irrawaddy delta, with bodies floating in salty water and children ripped from their parents' arms. At least 62,000 people are dead or missing, state media reported, and aid groups warned that thousands of children may have been orphaned and the area is on the verge of a medical disaster.

On Friday, Japan said it will give aid worth $10 million through the U.N. to Myanmar, adding to the massive amounts of aid that has been pledged by foreign governments.
But while accepting international aid, the isolationist regime of this Southeast Asian nation has refused to grant visas to foreign aid workers who could assess the extent of the disaster and manage the logistics.

"The frustration caused by what appears to be a paperwork delay is unprecedented in modern humanitarian relief efforts," said Paul Risley, a spokesman for the U.N. World Food Program in Bangkok. "It's astonishing."

He said the WFP submitted 10 visa applications around the world, including six in Bangkok, but none has been approved.

"We strongly urge the government of Myanmar to process these visa applications as quickly as possible, including work over the weekend," he said.

The junta said in a statement Friday it was grateful to the international community for its assistance — which has included 11 chartered planes loaded with aid supplies — but the best way to help was just to send in material rather than personnel.

One relief flight was sent back after landing in Yangon on Thursday because it carried a search-and-rescue team and media representatives who had not received permission to enter the country, the junta said. It did not give details, but said the plane had flown in from Qatar, apparently referring to a U.N. flight.

The announcement came as critical aid and experts to go with it were poised in neighboring Thailand and elsewhere to rush into Myanmar, one of the world's poorest nations.

"Believe me the government will not allow outsiders to go into the devastated area. The government only cares about its own stability. They don't care about the plight of the people," said Yangon food shop owner Joseph Kyaw, one of many residents angry at the regime for doing little to help them recover from the storm's destruction.

Among those waiting in Thailand were members of the USAID Disaster Assistance Response Team. Air Force transport planes and helicopters packed with supplies also sat waiting for a green light to enter Myanmar, also known as Burma.

Myanmar allowed the first major international aid shipment Thursday — four U.N. planes carrying high-energy biscuits, including one which was apparently turned back. On Friday, state-owned television showed a cargo plane from Italy with water containers, food and plastic sheets at Yangon international airport.

It is not clear how much of the aid is reaching the Irrawaddy delta. The U.N. estimates 1.5 million people have been "severely affected" and voiced "significant concern" about the disposal of dead bodies.

A Norway-based opposition news network, the Democratic Voice of Burma, provided graphic details of misery. In the village of Kongyangon, someone had written in Burmese, "We are all in trouble. Please come help us" on black asphalt, a video from the opposition group showed. A few feet away was another plea: "We're hungry," the words too small to be seen by air rescuers.
According to state media, 22,997 people died and 42,019 are missing from Cyclone Nargis, which hit the country's Irrawaddy delta on Saturday. Shari Villarosa, who heads the United States Embassy in Yangon, said the number of dead could eventually exceed 100,000 because of illnesses.

Grim assessments about what lies ahead continued: The aid group Action Against Hunger noted that the delta region is known as the country's granary, and the cyclone hit before the harvest.
"If the harvest has been destroyed this will have a devastating impact on food security in Myanmar," the group said.

Anders Ladegaard, secretary-general of the Danish Red Cross, called the relief operation "a nightmare."

"There are problems to the aid inside (Myanmar) and there are problems to get the aid out to the delta area. There are almost no boats and no helicopters," Ladegaard said by satellite telephone to Danish broadcaster DR.

In Yangon itself, the price of increasingly scarce water shot up by more than 500 percent, and rice and oil jumped by 60 percent over the last three days, the group said.
Hardships in the country's largest city have prompted some embassies, including that of the U.S., to send diplomats' families out of the country.
Although the military regime had begun allowing in the first major international aid shipments, it snubbed a U.S. offer to help cyclone victims.

By doing so, the junta refused to take advantage of Washington's enormous ability to deliver aid quickly, which was evident during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami that killed 230,000 people in a dozen nations.

With roads in the Irrawaddy delta washed out and the infrastructure in shambles, large swaths of the region are accessible only by air, something few other countries are equipped to handle as well as the U.S.

Thai Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej told reporters Friday that he will try to go to Myanmar on Sunday to persuade the junta to accept U.S. help.

But the junta told Samak his Myanmar counterpart is too busy to meet with him, said a Thai army general, speaking on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to speak to the media.

But a Taiwanese Buddhist leader who just returned from Yangon said Friday that Myanmar had mobilized soldiers and civilians to transport aid to cyclone victims.

"They try to handle the relief work by themselves as much as possible because they don't have the time to deal with external criticism," Master Hsin Tao said.

Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.




2. Secondly, let's look at the economics and military dynamics of the United States:

We have, during the course of the past several years made some courageous forays into the realms of overt imperialism, bullying, threatening, labelling and blatant lawlessness. It is indeed a brazen and self-confident administration that unapologetically lies to its own Congress; defies the rulings of its own Supreme Court; circumvents the letter and spirit of its contract with the people (the U.S. Constitution) by fiat, and with the simple explanation that the laws "were not made to apply to these circumstances," or that they are an "encumbrance to our national security." We have chosen to disregard the laws of other nations, and have created an enforcement machine out of the FBI which covers the world -- the CIA is a whimpering pup by comparison. In brief, we may have lost the trust of most of the civilized (and yet-to-be civilized world). The citizenry in the U.S. is increasingly worried (albeit very secretively, with Oprah Winfrey turned up very loud if any questioning of government policy takes place amongst the foolish youngsters in the house -- say, did you just get a flash of a mental picture of THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK, or was it just me?) about what exactly our country stands for. If we disregard our own due process, and if we disrespect the sovereignty of other nations, we could be perceived as bullies. People of high moral strandards who wish to form meaningful long-term alliances generally should avoid the perception of being bullies. And what is the purpose of national security when there are no freedoms or advantages left to protect?

3. Thirdly, in the Worldview, the junta (which doesn't even warrant capitalization) is comprised of barbarians and butchers...too paranoid and contol-obsessed to let an outside force come in even if it means saving the lives of hordes of sick and dying people. That constitutes depraved indifference.

In the Worldview, the U.S Administration is increasingly seen as a paranoic, completely unreceptive bully.

What then is the difference between these two power groups? The short answer is distressing:

  1. Several trillion dollars;
  2. Enormous weaponry;
  3. Some allies, although sycophantic ones, at that;
  4. More physical comforts;
  5. Better tailoring;
  6. More potent domestic media control and propaganda;
  7. A greater percentage of the population in prison or under restriction or supervision;
  8. Tendrils of influence throughout the world;
  9. An unsurpassed quotient of conceit.

Bullies make enemies. Bullies never have genuine allies. Bullies never engender unity. Bullies are feared and hated. Bullies are never trusted. Bullies are only temporary unifiers -- they cannot build lasting peace except during the time of their strict domination. Brutality invites reprisals and revolution -- it is only a matter of time.

In my simplistic view, a bully is simply a bully. At the heart of every bully is either a depraved sociopathic humanoid, or a horribly hypervigilant coward.

Further, each Human being is a sovereign unto himself or herself, with a right to be heard, with a right to defend himself or herself, with a right to fraternize with friends, and with an obligation to treat other sovereigns with respect.

An Internationalist is a social creature. He or she obtains value by giving value, and not by threats or acts of brutality. He or she builds a following by cooperation and attraction, and gains respect without imposing fear.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle, Internationalist

Blog Archive

Bookmark and Share